Goal setting for founders who dread goal setting


If you haven’t set your 2026 goals yet, you’re not alone. And you’re not too late.

Most scale-up founders delay, dilute or avoid goal setting

not because they don’t care or don’t see the value,

but because they’re already overloaded and

can’t shoulder another heavy lift.

But intentional goals are how you protect yourself from

another year of reactive decision-making.

This issue gives you a fast, founder-friendly system for setting goals

without burning hours and energy you don’t have to spare.

The Signal (your clue that there’s work to do)

If you don’t have your goals set for 2026, it’s probably not because you don’t see the value in them,

but because every prior attempt has been either:

  • too conceptual to guide decisions,
  • too complex to finish or
  • too disconnected from how your business actually runs to feel relevant.

You want goals that matter, not a list of wishes.

You want alignment, not annual theater.

You want a process that doesn’t feel like torture.

I want that for you too.

The Root Cause

Goal setting breaks down for founders for a few common reasons:

1. You zoom in too early.

“Fix onboarding” sits next to “improve margins” sits next to “expand into new markets,” sits next to “launch xyz new business line” so effectively everything sits at the same priority level… which basically means nothing is a priority.

2. You mix strategy with tasks, breakthrough innovation with business as usual.

Trying to name goals before extracting everything that’s on your mind guarantees an incomplete (or unrealistic) list that you dismiss almost immediately.

3. You skip the prioritization step.

You make your list, refine it, and then default to the items that feel immediate, so urgency ends up driving your choices instead of impact.

4. You underestimate the foundation.

Growth goals get the attention, while systems and team capacity get deferred. As a result, the business expands faster than it can support, leading to operational issues, slower execution, rampant burnout and constant firefighting.

The problem isn’t an inability to set actionable and ambitious goals for your business.

The problem is that the traditional goal-setting methods you’ve tried were built for

big companies — not for fast-moving, founder-led businesses in which

priorities shift quickly and resources are limited.

The Tool: The Goal Setting Framework

This is the 5-step system I use with visionary founders who want clarity fast,

but who struggle to narrow down the infinite possibilities they see

into strategic priorities their teams can execute against.

STEP 1: Wide-Angle Scan

Answer the four prompts below. Write whatever comes to mind,

no wordsmithing, no constraints, just raw capture.

What outcomes would make 2026 a successful year?
(Think: revenue, growth, product, operations, culture, systems, reputation.)
What foundations or systems must be built so the business stops leaning so heavily on you?
What problems or inefficiencies do you want solved once and for all?
What opportunities or big bets do you want to pursue?

STEP 2: Sort Into Three Buckets

Categorize each item from your wide-angle scan into one of the three buckets below.

  • STABILIZE: things that are foundational and things to fix
    • Goals that ladder to shoring up the foundation, building systems, structure and scaffolding
  • SUSTAIN: things are necessary to serve clients, keep the business operational and drive linear growth
    • “Business as usual” (BAU) tasks
  • STRETCH: things that unlock future (ideally exponential) growth
    • Big bets, strategic initiatives and capacity-building

These buckets reduce the likelihood that goals skew purely toward growth while ignoring the operational backbone that needs to be built to support that growth, and they mitigate against burnout by making sure “business as usual” (BAU) responsibilities don’t get ignored.

You should now have three short lists of goals, organized by category.

To stay organized in the next step, turn your lists into a scorecard. You’ll want 4 columns to record scores in.

STEP 3: Apply a Prioritization Filter

Score each item from 1–3 (1- low; 2 - moderate; 3 - high) on the following four factors:

  • Impact: Will it meaningfully move the business forward?
  • Leverage: Does it unlock or accelerate other goals?
  • Foundational Value: Does it strengthen long-term stability?
  • Doability: Can it be achieved with reasonable effort and resources?

You should now have a completed scorecard in which all goals have been scored against these 4 criteria.

Total up the scores for each goal. Scores will fall between 4-12 for each goal.

STEP 4: Select the Top Scorers

Curate a meaningful but manageable working list.

Using the scorecard totals, create a shortlist of goals that includes:

  • The highest-scoring goal in each bucket.
  • The three goals with the highest total scores, if not already captured
  • The two goals with the highest Impact score, if not already captured
  • The two goals with the highest Leverage scores, if not already captured
  • The two goals with the highest Foundation scores, if not already captured

With your shortlist in place, the technique that follows will help you dial it in.

The Technique: Goal Refinement

Most founders stop at the shortlist and wonder why execution falls apart.

The truth is simple: fewer goals executed well will outperform a broader set every time.

The technique that follows distills your list into the goals that actually make the difference.

A. Check for bucket balance

A strong goal set in a scaling company pulls from all three buckets. As a general rule of thumb:

  • STABILIZE (30–40%)
  • SUSTAIN (30–40%)
  • STRETCH (20–30%)

This is not meant to be overly prescriptive, just a safeguard against a common founder pitfall — growing faster than your systems can support.

Once your foundations are shored up, you can lean heavier into the STRETCH category.

B. Remove duplicates in disguise

Look for goals that address:

  • the same underlying issue,
  • the same capability gap or
  • the same operational constraint.

Keep the one with the highest leverage and drop the rest.

This prevents unnecessary complexity and protects your team’s bandwidth.

C. Assess feasibility honestly

Ask three questions for each goal:

  • Do we have the bandwidth to execute this well?
  • Do we have the right owner or the ability to hire one?
  • Do we have enough bandwidth to pursue this and the other goals on the list?

If the answer is “no” to any of the above, redesign or defer the goal.

A goal your team cannot realistically deliver on is not a goal, it’s a distraction.

D. Use the outcome test

For each goal, complete this sentence:

“If this were the only goal we achieved next year, it would be worth it because…”

If you cannot answer confidently and convincingly, the goal may not merit company-level significance.

E. Land on 5 or 6 goals, no more

This is the operational sweet spot for a scaling company,

and, as a general rule, less is more.

Visionary founders often assume more goals equals more impact, but by narrowing down to a refined list of goals,

you create the conditions for real momentum instead of scattered effort.

With your company goals defined, the next step is turning them into action, translating each one into clear departmental and individual commitments that drive execution across the business. We’ll tackle that in the next issue.

Why It Works

This approach works because it gives you structure without slowing you down.

Instead of choosing goals based on urgency or instinct, you’re using a

simple system to evaluate what the business actually needs:

direction, traction and focus.

  • The wide-angle scan surfaces everything competing for your attention so you’re not planning from a narrow or reactive lens.
  • The bucket sort forces balance, ensuring you’re not over-indexing on growth while ignoring the systems or bandwidth required to support it.
  • The scoring brings objectivity into a process that’s usually driven by pressure and emotion.
  • The refinement cuts the list to the goals that will create momentum, not just movement.

Most importantly, this process unlocks future focus.

And I, for one, can’t wait to see what you accomplish with it.

Your Turn

Reply and tell me: Which part of this process did you struggle with most: generating the list, scoring it, or narrowing it down?

Your answers will help me tailor future issues to the real friction points founders face.

And if you want help turning your refined company goals into departmental and individual commitments that drive measurable progress and high performance… Book a Signal Session.

We’ll convert your goals into clear accountability at every level so execution stops slipping through the cracks.

And if this felt like a lot and you didn’t finish it, no judgment.

We can tackle that in a Signal Session too. 🙌

The Signal Report

A weekly bulletin for leaders who have outgrown founder-led hustle and are ready to build systems that sustain their vision and scale their business. Each issue decodes one “signal” — those subtle patterns that reveal friction, bottlenecks or untapped leverage. You’ll learn what it means, why it matters and how to fix it, all in 5 minutes or less, so you can shift from signal to system and from vision to velocity.

Read more from The Signal Report
Close-up of a clock face with roman numerals.

If you're like most scale-up leaders, you’re busy from the moment you start until the moment you stop, yet the work that actually energizes you keeps getting pushed to “later”. Your days are filled with decisions, follow-ups, clarifications, approvals and gap-filling. It’s the work that keeps things moving, but it pulls you further away from the work that lights you up. You feel like a cog in your own machine. The Signal You’re not just tired. You’re drained, disenchanted, disconnected,...

Geometric pattern of triangles and diamonds in earthy tones

I see this pattern all the time in scale-ups that look healthy on paper but feel increasingly strained in practice. It happens when revenue becomes the goal instead of the result. In Science of Scaling, Benjamin Hardy makes a deceptively simple but critical point: Scale doesn’t happen by chasing upside, it happens by enforcing constraints. Specifically, by defining a floor -- the minimum standard below which you no longer operate if you’re serious about building the future you say you want....

A classic pink car driving on a street.

A common frustration among my clients — my team isn’t moving fast enough, they’re not willing to grow, they’re getting in the way — reveals a fundamental misread. What leaders experience as hesitation, pushback, slower execution, plausible deniability and CYA tactics isn’t resistance. It’s a structural gap and a signal. The Signal If you feel like you’re pushing and the organization is pushing back, there's a good chance that the business has outgrown its structure: roles are under-specified,...