|
Until your team has internalized the tradeoffs that matter most for your business, you either need to be in every decision or you need to be ready for a lot of unintended consequences. Decision Filters close the gap by giving your team practical guardrails to make aligned, confident decisions at scale. The Signal (your clue that there's work to do):You’re still the go-to for every signficant decision because your team can't confidently navigate the tradeoffs that keep coming up as you scale. You get pinged all day: “Should we absorb this rush fee?” “Can we approve this exception?” “Is it okay to swap this material?” “Do we move forward or wait?” If they don’t ask, they guess, and their guess is often misaligned with the business realities you’re holding in your head:
Cost to the business: stalled work, inefficiency, inconsistency and preventable fires. Cost to you: cognitive load and lost energy spent on decisions you shouldn’t be making. The Root Cause:Your team isn’t struggling with intelligence or initiative, they’re struggling with unclear tradeoffs. So they default to:
Here’s the thing: your team can’t make leadership-level decisions if they don’t understand leadership-level tradeoffs. This is the gap Decision Filters are designed to fill. The Tool: Decision FilterDecision Filters are a short list of guiding questions your team can use to internalize your tradeoff calculations and make decisions the way you do. Each filter:
Think of this as the “how we think around here” cheat sheet. Below is a base set of five Decision Filters you can customize. 1. Time Sensitivity Does this decision support on-time delivery and operational flow? When this filter applies: Any time the team is deciding whether to say yes to a last-minute change, rush request, or internal delay. Framing question: “Will this cause a delay of more than [X hours/days]?” Example: A client requests a small change to a project already in motion. If the tweak can be absorbed without affecting install or launch dates, the team moves forward. 2. Financial ImpactDoes this decision make financial sense within our operating model? When this filter applies: Any time there’s a discount consideration, scope creep, vendor change or cost increase. Framing question: “Will this increase costs by more than [X%] or reduce revenue by more than [Y%]?” Example: A client pushes for a 15% discount to “lock in” a bigger order. Before agreeing to close the sale, the team runs the numbers and sees that at the requested price, the work is barely profitable. 3. Quality & Reputation Does this decision uphold our quality standards and protect customer trust? When this filter applies: Any time there’s a shortcut, substitution or workaround being considered. Framing question: “Will this change negatively affect safety, durability or customer perception?” Example: Ops finds a cheaper material or vendor with slightly lower specs. On paper, it saves money and keeps the timeline intact. But the product is more likely to fail earlier in the field. The team understands this isn’t just a cost decision -- it’s a tradeoff between short-term savings and long-term trust. 4. Company Values & Standards Does this decision align with our core principles and values? When this filter applies: Vendor selection, partnership decisions, people decisions, anything that touches culture, ethics or brand promises. Framing question: “Is this how we do business? Does this maintain ethical and compliance standards?” Example: A vendor offers a fast, cheap solution but has questionable labor practices. This isn’t a purely operational tradeoff, it’s a statement about whose standards you’re willing to align with. The team recognizes that “we don’t look away from this stuff” is part of how the business operates. 5. Recoverability Can this decision be easily undone if it turns out to be wrong? When this filter applies: Any time the team is considering a new process, a new policy, a major client promise or a structural change. Framing question “If this decision is a mistake, can we fix it within [X time] and for less than [$X]? Example: The team wants to pilot a new client onboarding step that adds time but might improve retention. If it’s easy to roll back after a month and doesn’t require redoing contracts or major tech changes, they can treat it as a low-risk test instead of a permanent shift. This filter helps them see the difference between “experiment” and “one-way door.” Optional Filters to layer in (if they apply):
Decision Filters give your team a shared lens for balancing speed, cost, quality, customer impact, and risk the way you would. When these principles are explicit and easy to apply, your team starts making consistent, leadership-aligned decisions without slowing you down. (Side Note: The next evolution is your team knowing when a decision stays with them and when it crosses into territory that requires you. That’s where Escalation Criteria come in. We’ll cover those in a future issue.) The Fix: Putting Decision Filters to Work 1. Start with three real decisions that went sideways.
For each, jot down:
You’ve just surfaced your implicit filters. 2. Draft your first Decision Filter Stack. Using the findings above:
3. Define preliminary escalation triggers Next to each filter, define:
You don’t need a 10-page policy. You need statements like:
We’ll go deeper into Escalation Criteria later in a future issue. For now, this gives your team clear guardrails. 4. Roll the Decision Filters out in a live working session. Bring your leadership or core team together and:
Make it collaborative: invite questions and edge cases. Let the team pressure test the Decision Filters and make adjustments as needed. 5. Reinforce through recognition, not just correction. To make this stick, build a decision-literate culture:
Why Decision Filters Work
Your Turn Hit reply and let me know: If you had to name one non-negotiable filter today that you most want your team to internalize (time, money, quality, values, recoverability…), what would it be? If you’re ready to build out your Decision Filters, send me a quick note and I’ll send you a worksheet to make it super simple. Want help defining your Decision Filters and Escalation Criteria? A Signal Session is your best next move. In one focused session, we’ll:
If you’re ready to stop being a bottleneck and start scaling judgment across your team, book your Signal Session today. You can catch up on past issues any time HERE. |
A biweekly bulletin for leaders who have outgrown founder-led hustle and are ready to build systems that sustain their vision and scale their business. Each issue decodes one “signal” — those subtle patterns that reveal friction, bottlenecks or untapped leverage. You’ll learn what it means, why it matters and how to fix it, all in 5 minutes or less, so you can shift from signal to system and from vision to velocity.
Last week, we dove deep on Decision Filters -- the guardrails that help your team internalize your tradeoff calculations and make decisions the way you do (without asking first). This week, we’re expanding on the natural next layer: Escalation Triggers. Even with strong filters in place, your team still needs to know exactly when a call is no longer in their lane. Without that clarity, fear and decision paralysis creep in, putting everything back on your plate. The Signal: Your clue that...
THE SIGNAL You thought you delegated clearly: “Can you pull together a quick deck on X for next week’s meeting?” Three days later, you’re reviewing a 40-slide masterpiece that took your best strategist and a graphic designer the better part of three days to build. It’s beautiful. It’s also extreme overkill for what you actually needed: five simple slides to drive a decision. Or the opposite: You ask for “a plan” and get three bullet points in Slack with no tradeoffs or clear direction. You...
The Signal You’re overwhelmed. Not from doing too much, but from deciding too much. Some days it feels like your brain is actually melting. Your team asks for your input on everything from vendor selection to pricing tweaks to copy edits. You jump in because it’s faster, you know the context and you can’t afford mistakes. That might have worked at the beginning... but it’s not faster anymore. You’ve become the bottleneck. Projects slow down waiting for your approval. The team hesitates...